فصلنامه علمی راهبرد

فصلنامه علمی راهبرد

روش‌شناسی و روش فهم «نظام فکری و اندیشه»‌ ولیّ فقیه

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه مدیریت راهبردی، دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران
2 گروه مدیریت راهبردی، پژوهشکده مدیریت راهبردی دانشگاه عالی دفاع ملی، تهران، ایران
چکیده
با پیروزی انقلاب اسلامی و آرمان تمدن‌سازی، همواره یکی از مهمترین چالش‌ها؛ بر سر تبیین نظریه و الگوی اداره‌ی حکومت اسلامی در تمامی ابعاد آن از اقتصاد، سیاست و فرهنگ تا مدیریت شئون و نیازهای فردی آحاد جامعه است. ازجمله دغدغه‌های پژوهشگران علوم انسانی نیز، تبیین نظری و استخراج الگوهای مورد نیاز علمی و تفحص در اندیشه‌ی رهبران انقلاب اسلامی در جایگاه «ولایت‌فقیه» می‌باشد. مسئله اصلی این که برای فهم بیانات و انکشاف اندیشه‌های ولی‌فقیه، به مثابه یک متن یا یک اندیشه؛ مشابه دیگر متون و اندیشه‌ها مواجهه مرسوم صورت گیرد یا با توجه به جایگاه قدسی آن در اندیشه‌ی اسلامی، روش شناسی و روش متفاوتی برای استخراج الگو و نظریه از اندیشه‌ی «ولی» و فهم باطنی آن لازم بوده و نمی توان تقلیل گرایی روشی و استنباطی داشت.
این پژوهش با ابتنا به فلسفه اسلامی، به لحاظ هدف بنیادین و از حیث گردآوری اطلاعات، کتابخانه ای و میدانی و ابزارهای مصاحبه های عمیق است. راهبرد تحلیل داده ها تحلیل مضمون، که در سه مرحله از مجموع 188 گزاره ماخوذ از مصاحبه‌های تخصصی، 198 مضمون پایه، 17 مضمون سازمان دهنده و 7 مضمون فراگیر استخراج گردید. دریافته ها با رویکرد تاسیسی و نوآورانه، الگوی اکتشافی روش شناسی و روش فهم و کشف نظام فکری و اندیشه ای ولی، با ابتنا به چهار رکن« قواعد عام اصول فقه و استبصار از مأنوسین ولی فقیه»؛« مبنایابی و تحلیل تاریخی و سیره‌پژوهی»؛« تحلیل گفتمان اندیشه ولی فقیه»؛« مبنایابی قرآنی و کمی سازی داده‌های موضوع مورد بحث»، تحت عنوان روش «اُنس» پیشنهاد شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Methodology and Method of Understanding the "System of Thought and Idea " of the Vali-e Faqih

نویسندگان English

Seyed Javad Amini 1
vahid safi esfahani 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Strategic Management, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Research Institute, Supreme National Defense University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

With the victory of the Islamic Revolution of Iran and the ideal of establishing an Islamic civilization, one of the most persistent challenges has been to articulate a comprehensive theory and model of Islamic governance encompassing all its dimensions—from economy, politics, and culture to the management of societal affairs and the fulfillment of individual needs. Among the primary concerns of humanities scholars is the theoretical explanation and extraction of essential scientific models, as well as the study of the intellectual foundations of the leaders of the Islamic Revolution within the framework of velayat-e-faqih (guardianship of the jurist). The central issue is that, in order to understand the statements and evolution of the Vali-e Faqih’s thought—whether as a text or as an idea—one must determine whether it should be approached through conventional interpretive methods, similar to other texts and ideas, or whether, given its sacred position in Islamic thought, a distinct methodology is required to extract a theoretical model from the Vali’s thought and its esoteric dimensions. Methodological and inferential reductionism, therefore, is not appropriate in this context. This study is grounded in Islamic philosophy in terms of its fundamental purpose. In terms of data collection, it employs both library research and fieldwork, with in-depth interviews as the primary tools. Data Analysis Strategy: Thematic analysis was employed in three stages. From a total of 188 statements collected through expert interviews, 198 basic themes, 17 organizing themes, and 7 overarching themes were extracted. The findings, through an innovative and established approach, propose an exploratory methodological framework for understanding and discovering the intellectual and cognitive system of the Vali. This framework—termed the “Uns Method”—is based on four main pillars: (1) the general principles of jurisprudence and inference derived from the familiarity with the Vali-e Faqih; (2) historical and character study and analysis; (3) discourse analysis of the Vali-e Faqih’s thought; and (4) Qur’anic research and data quantification of the topic under discussion.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

System of Thought and Idea " of the Vali-e Faqih, Islamic Revolution, Methodology, Uns method
-  Abedi Jafari, H., Taslimi, M., Faghihi, A., & Sheikhzadeh, M. (2011). Thematic analysis and the network of themes: A simple and efficient method for explaining existing patterns in qualitative data. Strategic Management Thought, 5(10), 151–198. [In Persian]
-  Amini, S. J., & Safi Esfahani, V. (2025). Governance model in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Supreme National Defense University. [In Persian]
-  Caws, P. (1967). Scientific Method. In P. Edwards (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York: Macmillan.
-  Faramarzi Gharamaleki, A. (2015). Methodology of Religious Studies. Mashhad: Razavi University of Islamic Sciences Press. [In Persian]
-  Fairclough, N. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. (Trans. Group of Translators). Tehran: Center for Media Studies and Research. [In Persian]
-  Flick, U. (2013). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. (Trans. H. Jalili). Tehran: Ney Publishing. [In Persian]
-  Habibi, A. (2021). Advanced Research Methods. Tehran: Narvan Danesh. [In Persian]
-  Holy Qur’an. [In Persian]
-  Imam Ali (A.S.). (2000). Nahj al-Balagha. (Trans. M. Dashti). Qom: Aal-e Ali (A.S.) Publications. [In Persian]
-  Iran, Islamic Republic of. (1989). The Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]
-  Jahanbin, F., & Heydari, Y. (2023). Analysis of the Islamic Republic of Iran’s policy in cyberspace based on the views of Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei. Quarterly Journal Strategic, 32(4), 109. [In Persian]
-  Khomeini, R. (1998). Velayat-e Faqih (Governance of the Jurist). Tehran: Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works. [In Persian]
-  Khosropanah, A., & Group of Researchers. (2016). The Intellectual System of Imam Khomeini. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
-  Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. (Trans. G. Bennington & B. Massumi). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
-  McDonnell, D. (2001). Theories of Discourse. (Trans. H. Nozari). Tehran: Farhang-e Gofteman. [In Persian]
-  Milner, A., & Browitt, J. (2006). An Introduction to Contemporary Cultural Theory. (Trans. J. Mohammadi). Tehran: Ghoghnoos Publications. [In Persian]
-  Nola, R., & Sankey, H. (2007). Theories of Scientific Method: An Introduction. Philosophy and Science Series. Chesham: Acumen.
-  Pakatchi, A. (2016). Methodology in Islamic Sciences (The concept and types of method). In N. Bahonar (Ed.), Discourses on Islamic Culture and Communication (Vol. 2). Tehran: Imam Sadiq University Press. [In Persian]
-  Saroukhani, B. (1996). Research Methods in Social Sciences. Tehran: Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies. [In Persian]
-  Soozanji, H. (2012). The reproduction of the philosophy of humanities based on Islamic philosophy. Israa Quarterly Journal, 11, 69–118. [In Persian]
-  Winch, P. (1958). The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
-  Yavazi, M. R. (2017). Methodology for studying and understanding Imam Khomeini’s political thought. Journal of Political Thought in Islam, 13, 99–120. [In Persian]
-  Hadith-e Velayat Software: A collection of statements by the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [In Persian]
-  Noor Imam Khomeini Software: A comprehensive digital archive of Imam Khomeini’s works. [In Persian]

  • تاریخ دریافت 02 خرداد 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 30 مرداد 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 03 شهریور 1404