فصلنامه علمی راهبرد

فصلنامه علمی راهبرد

حکمرانی طبیعت‌محور: پیوند تئوری و اجرا برای همزیستی پایدار انسان و طبیعت در ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه محیط زیست، دانشکده منابع طبیعی ، دانشگاه تهران
2 استاد دانشکده منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران
3 دانشیار دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
این مقاله مدل حکمرانی طبیعت‌محور (NOG) را معرفی و بررسی می‌کند که رویکردی عملی مبتنی بر اصول محیط زیستی-اجتماعی و اولویت دادن به طبیعت در سازوکارهای حکمرانی است. هدف اصلی پژوهش، توسعه یک چارچوب مفهومی و تحلیلی بعنوان یک مدل حکمرانی برای تطبیق با نیازهای مختلف و حل چالش‌های اجتماعی-محیط زیستی فعلی در کشور ایران است. این چارچوب از طریق مرور ادبیات، تجربیات عملی، و همکاری با محققان ملی و بین المللی و ذینفعان محلی به‌وجود آمده و بر ادغام علوم مختلف، تعاملات انسانی-طبیعی، و قابلیت تطبیق‌پذیری تاکید دارد. چارچوب تحلیلی مدل NOG که شامل متغیرها و شاخص‌های قابل تنظیم است، به ذینفعان اجازه می‌دهد تا در فرایند تصمیم‌گیری مشارکت کنند. ابزار اصلی این چارچوب، راه‌حل‌های مبتنی بر طبیعت (NBS) است که به تسریع تغییر پارادایم حکمرانی کمک می‌کند و همسویی بیشتری بین اقدامات انسانی و الزامات محیط زیستی را ایجاد می‌کند. این مدل در سطح محلی مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است و نتیجه این بررسی در تدقیق مدل مفهومی و تحلیلی این مدل تاثیر بسزایی داشته است. اهمیت این پژوهش در پتانسیل آن برای تحول در پارادایم‌های حکمرانی است و در راستای نظریه حکمرانی تکاملی حرکت می کند و راه را برای تصمیم‌گیری‌های آگاهانه‌تر در تلاقی سیستم‌های انسانی و طبیعی هموار می‌سازد. نتایج پژوهش به عنوان استراتژی عملی برای مقابله با چالش‌های اجتماعی-محیط زیستی، الگویی برای سایر مناطق و کشورها در جهت دستیابی به حکمرانی طبیعت محور و همسوسازی توسعه انسانی با اولویت های محیط زیستی ارائه می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله English

Nature-Oriented Governance: Bridging Theory and Practice for Sustainable Human-Nature Integration in Iran

نویسندگان English

Mohsen Soleymani Roozbahani 1
Afshin Danehkar 2
Ali Bagheri 3
1 Department of environment,, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran
2 Professor, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

This research introduces the Nature-Oriented Governance (NOG) model as a response to the complex socio-environmental challenges, including climate change, biodiversity loss, and unsustainable natural resource management, alongside the resilience of social systems in facing these challenges. The research methodology is based on qualitative content analysis, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and the Likert scale, conducted through an evolutionary and participatory process. The theoretical concepts of this model are grounded in principles that emphasize the integration of various sciences and focus on human-nature interactions, contributing to its adaptability in different contexts. The primary objective of this research is to introduce the conceptual and analytical framework of the NOG model, which includes a dynamic system connecting governance components and developing indicators and variables that, while operationalizing this model, enable its evaluation and analysis in various conditions. This model allows stakeholders to actively participate in decision-making processes and provide feedback. One of the key tools in this framework is Nature-Based Solutions (NBS), which leverage natural processes to accelerate and operationalize governance changes. The research findings indicate that the NOG model functions as a practical and flexible framework for sustainable governance and aligning human development with environmental requirements. This model can be employed in various regions of the country as a practical strategy for sustainable natural resource management and enhancing the resilience of social systems towards social, economic, and environmental sustainability. The innovation of this model lies in its ability to link social and natural systems in a transformative and gradual pathway within the governance paradigm.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Key words: Nature Oriented Governance
Nature Based Solution
Socio-Ecological Systems
Socio-
Environmental Sustainability
  • Albert, C., Schröter, B., Haase, D., Brillinger, M., Henze, J., Herrmann, S., Gottwald, S., Guerrero, P., Nicolas, C., & Matzdorf, B. (2019). Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landscape and urban planning, 182, 12-21.
  • Albert, C., Spangenberg, J. H., & Schröter, B. (2017). Nature-based solutions: criteria. Nature, 543(7645), 315-315.
  • Bergsten, A., Jiren, T. S., Leventon, J., Dorresteijn, I., Schultner, J., & Fischer, J. (2019). Identifying governance gaps among interlinked sustainability challenges. Environmental science & policy, 91, 27-38.
  • Déjeant-Pons, M. (2006). The European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 31(4), 363-384.
  • Ebrahimpour, H., Zahra, F., Vali, N., & Nasrin, H. (2020). Analyzing the Role of Moderating Good Governance in the Relationship
  • Between Globalization and Economic Growth in Developing
  • Countries Strategic studies of public policies 10(36), 40-69 [Persian].
  • Egusquiza, A., Cortese, , & Perfido, D. (2019). Mapping of innovative governance models to overcome barriers for nature based urban regeneration. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science,
  • Escap, U. (2009). What is good governance?
  • Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, , De Boissezon, B., & Vandewoestijne, S. (2017). Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environmental research, 159, 509-518.
  • Farazmand, A. (2015). Governance in the age of globalization: Challenges and opportunities for South and Southeast Asia. Governance in South, Southeast, and East Asia: Trends, Issues and Challenges, 11-26 [Persian].
  • Folke, C., Colding, J., & Berkes, F. (2003). Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social-ecological systems. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, 9(1), 352-387.
  • Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Seven lessons for planning nature-based solutions in cities. Environmental science & policy, 93, 101-111.
  • Galler, C., von Haaren, C., & Albert, C. (2015). Optimizing environmental measures for landscape multifunctionality: Effectiveness, efficiency and recommendations for agri-environmental programs. Journal of environmental management, 151, 243-257.
  • Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons: the population problem has no technical solution; it requires a fundamental extension in morality. science, 162(3859), 1243-1248.
  • Hölscher, K. (2020). Capacities for transformative climate governance: A conceptual framework. Transformative Climate Governance: A Capacities Perspective to Systematise, Evaluate and Guide Climate Action, 49-96.
  • Jager, W., & Gotts, N. (2018). Simulating social environmental systems. Environmental Psychology: An Introduction, 319-329.
  • Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2003). Governance for sustainability through transition management. Open Meeting of Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change Research Community, Montreal, Canada,
  • Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. Jhu Press.
  • Koskimaa, V., Rapeli, L., & Hiedanpää, J. (2021). Governing through strategies: How does Finland sustain a future-oriented environmental policy for the long term? Futures, 125, 102667.
  • Kremen, C. (2005). Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology? Ecology letters, 8(5), 468-479.
  • Leal Filho, W., Tripathi, S. K., Andrade Guerra, J., Giné-Garriga, R., Orlovic Lovren, V., & Willats, J. (2019). Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 26(2), 179-190.
  • Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annu. Rev. Environ. , 31, 297-325.
  • Lubell, M. (2002). Environmental activism as collective action. Environment and Behavior, 34(4), 431-454.
  • Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution.
  • McGinnis, M. D., & Ostrom, E. (2014). Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2).
  • Meckling, J., & Allan, B. B. (2020). The evolution of ideas in global climate policy. Nature climate change, 10(5), 434-438.
  • Moirano, R., Sánchez, M. A., & Štěpánek, L. (2020). Creative interdisciplinary collaboration: A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100626.
  • Mondal, S., & Palit, D. (2022). Challenges in natural resource management for ecological sustainability. In Natural Resources Conservation and Advances for Sustainability (pp. 29-59). Elsevier.
  • Monkelbaan, J. (2019). Governance for the sustainable development goals. Singapura: Spinger.
  • Nelson, D. R., Bledsoe, B. P., Ferreira, S., & Nibbelink, N. P. (2020). Challenges to realizing the potential of nature-based solutions. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 45, 49-55.
  • Nesshöver, C., Assmuth, T., Irvine, K. N., Rusch, G. M., Waylen, K. A., Delbaere, B., Haase, , Jones-Walters, L., Keune, H., & Kovacs, E. (2017). The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the total environment, 579, 1215-1227.
  • O'Sullivan, J. N. (2020). The social and environmental influences of population growth rate and demographic pressure deserve greater attention in ecological economics. Ecological economics, 172, 106648.
  • Olson, M. (2012). The logic of collective action [1965]. Contemporary Sociological Theory, 124, p62-63.
  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge university press.
  • Ostrom, E. (2009). Building trust to solve commons dilemmas: Taking small steps to test an evolving theory of collective action. Springer.
  • Pascual, U., McElwee, P. D., Diamond, S. E., Ngo, H. T., Bai, X., Cheung, W. W., Lim, M., Steiner, N., Agard, J., & Donatti, C. I. (2022). Governing for transformative change across the biodiversity–climate–society nexus. BioScience, 72(7), 684-70
  • Programme, U. N. D. (2014). Governance for sustainable development: integrating governance in the post-2015 development framework. In: Democratic Governance Group, Bureau for Development Policy, United Nations….
  • Renn, O., Laubichler, M., Lucas, K., Kröger, W., Schanze, J., Scholz, R. W., & Schweizer, P. J. (2022). Systemic risks from different perspectives. Risk analysis, 42(9), 1902-1920.
  • Roozbahani, M. S., Daneh-Kar, A., & Bagheri, A. (2023). A Review of Environmental Priorities in Iran's Governance Instruments. The Scientific Journal of Strategy, 32(107).
  • Schlüter, M., Hinkel, J., Bots, P. W., & Arlinghaus, R. (2014). Application of the SES framework for model-based analysis of the dynamics of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 19(1).
  • Shivanna, K. (2020). The sixth mass extinction crisis and its impact on biodiversity and human welfare. Resonance, 25(1), 93-109.
  • Williams, D., & Young, T. (1994). Governance, the World Bank and liberal theory. Political studies, 42(1), 84-100.
  • Winkler, K. J., Garcia Rodrigues, J., Albrecht, E., & Crockett, E. T. (2021). Governance of ecosystem services: a review of empirical literature. Ecosystems and People, 17(1), 306-319.
  • Wynn, D. C., & Eckert, C. M. (2017). Perspectives on iteration in design and development. Research in Engineering Design, 28, 153-184.
  • Zabaniotou, A. (2020). A systemic approach to resilience and ecological sustainability during the COVID-19 pandemic: Human, societal, and ecological health as a system-wide emergent property in the Anthropocene. Global transitions, 2, 116-126.
  • Zahiri, M., Zaianderoodi, M., & Jalaee, S. A. (2021). Investigating the Effect of Good Governance Dimensions on the Sustainable Development Index of Iran. Macroeconomics Research Letter, 15.
  • Zahiri, M., & Zaianderoodi, M. J., Seyyed Abdolmajid (2021). Investigating the Effect of Good Governance Dimensions on the Sustainable Development Index of Iran. Macroeconomics Research Letter, 15(30), 210-231 [Persian].

  • تاریخ دریافت 27 تیر 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 23 مهر 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 آبان 1403