Strategy

Strategy

An Analysis of Urban Livability Dimensions in Tehran: Emphasizing Sustainable Development (A Case Study of the Sirous Neighborhood)

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Department of Environment, Roudhen Branch, Faculty of Agriculture and Basic Sciences, Islamic Azad University of Roudhen, Tehran, Iran.
2 Department of Environment, Faculty of Agriculture and Basic Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen Branch, Roudehen, Iran
Abstract
Increasing urbanization and population growth have brought forth numerous challenges in urban environments. This unyielding expansion, encompassing aspects of physical, social, economic, and environmental dimensions, has impeded the realization of sustainability in urban contexts. Compounded by issues like environmental pollution and diminished tranquility among inhabitants, these developments have adversely affected the quality of urban life. Consequently, the concepts of livability and sustainable development have gained paramount importance in contemporary urban settings. This study aims to analyze the livability of the Cyrus neighborhood, with a focus on sustainable development in District 12 of the Tehran Municipality. Methodologically, this research adopts a descriptive-analytical approach and falls under the category of applied research, aiming to address specific objectives. The statistical population encompasses experts from the Tehran Municipality of District 12 and the Cyrus Neighborhood Development Office, utilizing probability and stratified sampling techniques. The research results offer an in-depth analysis and comprehension of the Cyrus neighborhood’s livability, centered on sustainable development. It proposes a model grounded in the theoretical framework and data analyzed through a one-sample T-test and structural equation modeling. The findings reveal that, when viewed through the lens of sustainable development, the livability status in the Cyrus neighborhood is deemed average and unsatisfactory. Structural equation modeling results demonstrate that physical-environmental factors, with a beta coefficient of 34.24, exert the most influence on the neighborhood’s livability. In contrast, managerial factors, with a beta coefficient of 4.2, exhibit the least impact.
Keywords

Subjects


  • Aref Hosseini, A. P. (2019). Measurement and subjective evaluation of livability in the urban contexts of Kalanshertbriz. Scientific Journal of Geography and Planning, 74-92.
  • Ashnoyi nosh Abadi, A. E. (2020). Determining key drivers affecting livability with a future research approach (case study: Kashan). Scientific Journal of Geography and Planning, 19.
  • Brian, C. M. (2009). Education for Sustainable Development. Papers in Honor of the United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development, 204.
  • Carmona, m. &. (2002). measuring quality in planning managing the performance spon. press London and New York, 209.
  • Dongsheng, Z. M. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China, Cities. china: 79.
  • Dongsheng, Z. M. (2018). ssessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China, Cities. china: china.
  • Evans, P. (2002). ivable Cities? “Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainabilit University of California. California: Ltd.
  • Evans, P. (2002). ivable Cities? “Urban Struggles for Livelihood and Sustainabilit University of California. California: Ltd.
  • Faraji Melai, A. (2014). Investigating the quality of the environment of worn-out fabric in Moft neighborhood, Abad district 13, Tehran. quarterly magazine of city landscape research, 61-87.
  • Flynn, P. b. (2002). stainably & quality of life indicators: toward the integ ration of economic, social and environmental measures. social health, 7.
  • Fouladi, E. B. Behbahaninia, A. (2023). Achieving Environmental Security by Emphasizing the Importance of Environmental Standards in Strategic Urban Development Plans (Tehran Case Study). Strategy, 165-193.
  • Gooderzi, H. Y. (2018). Analyzing the livability of urban areas in sustainable development (Study: Region 22),. Geography and Human Relations Quarterly, 9.
  • Hall, p. (2003). smart Growth on two continedis, in p Neal. ed. Urban villages and the making of communities. press London, 214.
  • Heydari, M. k. (2017). Analyzing livability in urban spaces with a physical approach; Case study: Zanjan city. Geography Quarterly (Regional Planning), 23-40.
  • ingjing Liu, J. C. (2022). hreshold effect of tourism density on urban livability: a modeling study on Chinese cities. china: Springer.
  • kazemian, G. a. (2021). From the point of view of governance; Explaining the challenges of Tehran's urban construction management in the path of creating sustainable development. Strategic scientific quarterly, 635-689.
  • Kazemian, G. R. (2016). The place of new and renewable energies in making cities more livable, a case study of Tehran city. ournal of Urban Research and Planning, 99-118.
  • Khazainejad, F. (2018). Analysis of livability in the central part of Tehran, subject of research: District 12 neighborhoods. Geography and development of urban space, 45-70.
  • Khorasani, M... (2012). Explaining the livability of peri-urban villages with the quality of life approach of a case study of Varamin city,. tehran university, 74.
  • Khorasani, M... (2015). A reflection on the concept of livability; Recognition, assessment and approaches. bimonthly research in art and human sciences,, 9-15.
  • Khorasani, M. (2015). A reflection on the concept of livability; Recognition, assessment and approaches. (Khorasani, A reflection on the concept of livability; Recognition, assessment and approaches, 2015), 9-15.
  • Kovacs, A. A. (2020). Opportunities and Challenges of Geospatial Analysis for Promoting Urban Livability in the Era of Big Data and Machine Learning. International Journal of Gei Information, 32.
  • Majdi, H. B. (2009). Examining global and local standards of livable city. City identity.
  • Majed, v. M. (2012). Sustainable urban development planning with nuclear planning approach. Strategic scientific quarterly, 44-72.
  • Mehranjani, S., M., M., & H., B. Z. (2012). Measuring the quality of life in transitioning urban neighborhoods (Study case: Shemiran Gate neighborhood of Tehran's 12th district). International Quarterly Journal of the Geographical Society of Iran, 38-45.
  • Mousavi, N. Z. (2016). Analysis of the effects of scattered urban growth on the livability of urban areas, case: Maragheh city. Urban Research and Planning Journal,, 1-18.
  • Salehi Fard, M. (2003). valuation of the role and place of the sustainable urban development model in the structure of urbanization in Iran,. olitical economic information, 146-153.
  • Sarafi, M. R. (2018). Measuring and evaluating the condition of street livability components from the perspective of citizens (case study: Waliasr Street, Tehran). New Attitudes in Human Geography,, 3-10.
  • Shalchi, V. J. (2015). Reproducing social inequality in Tehran through the interaction of capital and space. Social and Cultural Development Studies Quarterly, 87-120.
  • Soleimani Mehranjani, M. M. (2012). Measuring the quality of life in transitioning urban neighborhoods (Study case: Shemiran Gate neighborhood of Tehran's 12th district). International Quarterly Journal of the Geographical Society of Iran, 38.
  • Urooj, S. S. (2022). An Integrated Approach for Developing an Urban Livability Composite Index—A Cities’ Ranking Road Map to Achieve Urban Sustainability,. Sustainability, 14.
  • YingqiCaoa, F. D. (2021). Urban livability: Agent-based simulation, assessment, and interpretation for the case of Futian District, Shenzhen. Cleaner Production, 128.
  • Zanella, A., Camanho, A., & Dias, T. (2015). The assessment of cities’ livability integrating human wellbeing and environmental impact. Oper. Res, 695-726.
  • Ziyari, K. H. (2017). evaluation and prioritization of livability components in Bam city. Urban Social Geography, 19-24.

 

  • Receive Date 20 August 2023
  • Revise Date 16 September 2023
  • Accept Date 17 September 2023