Feasibility Study on Privatization of Government Plans and Projects in Pursuit of principles of Article (44) of the Constitution; Challenges, Strategies and Achievements

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 PhD student in Public Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch

2 Assistant Professor, Faculty of Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch

3 Member of Expediency Discernment Council, Ph.D.;

4 Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch

Abstract

In recent years, due to the growing population and economic development of the country, there is a strong need for infrastructure in the country. And while government funds are often limited and non-optimal for the development of the infrastructure required by a country. Given the government's responsibilities in providing infrastructure in one hand and, by referring to the principles of Article 44 of the Constitution regarding the government's lack of enter to economic activities on the other, the Privatization of plans and projects from the beginning is necessary. In general, the purpose of this study is to investigate the privatization of the country's infrastructure and determine the challenges, strategies and achievements for using the private sector in infrastructure construction operations and feasibility studies in the country. Based on this, descriptive and correlation and analytical methods of exploratory factor were used to obtain operational results. It also describes, predicts and controls the variables. The statistical population used in this study was calculated using Cochran formula with 95% confidence level and 0.05 error rate of 36 people. The Bartlett and KMO tests were used to explain the factor burden of the variables. The results are significant level of Bartlett test (Sig = 0.00) and the numerical value of KMO standard is 0.671, which shows the suitability of the data for performing factor analysis.In the determination of the number of extraction factors using the Kaiser criterion, the special value of 6 factors is greater than 1 and these factors account for 89.25% of the data variation. Thus, the hidden factors are respectively the first factor:Theory affecting in Government Plans and Projects,the second factor:Explaining Effective Capital in Government Plans and Projects, the third factor:Policy Balance, the fourth factor:Motivate the private sector,Fifth factor:Liberalization, and Sixth factor:Sustainable advancement ofGovernment Plans and Projects.

Keywords

References

پاکدامن، رضا (1388). رویکردهای اجرایی و مبانی قانونی خصوصی‌سازی، مرکز آموزش و تحقیقات صنعتی ایران، تهران.
خامنه ای، سید علی (رهبر انقلاب اسلامی):  http://farsi.khamenei.ir/و http://leader.ir/
دفتر همکاری حوزه و دانـشگاه (1371)، مبـانی اقتـصاد اسـلامی، قـم: سـازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب دانشگاهی (سمت)، اول.
کریم، محمد حسین؛ شقاقی شهری، وحید؛ نصری، لیلا (1394). ارزیابی فرآیند خصوصی‌سازی در راستای سیاست‌های کلی اصل 44 قانون اساسی (ارتقای سهم بخش خصوصی در اقتصاد ایران)، فصلنامه سیاست‌های راهبردی و کلان، سال سوم، شماره یازدهم، صفحات 49-62.
کلاین، پل (1380). راهنمای آسان تحلیل عاملی،  ترجمه حلال صدرالسادات، اصغری مینایی. تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه‌ها (سمت).
کیانپور، سعید (1388). بررسی اجمالی خصوصی‌سازی در چند کشور منتخب با اشاره‌ای بر سیاست‌های کلی اصل ۴۴، بررسی‌های بازرگانی، شماره 38، صص 2-20.
مرتضوی، مهدی؛ زارع‌پور، فیض‌اله؛ غفرانی، فهیمه (1391). بررسی الزامات و موانع اجرایی و اداری توسعه مشارکت عمومی-خصوصی (ppp) در ایران. مقالات همایش ملی مشارکت عمومی و خصوصی در توسعه زیرساخت. صص 81-95.
محنت فر، یوسف؛ جعفری، احمد (1387). «بررسی خصوصی‌سازی و اصل 44 قانون اساسی در اقتصاد ایران»، پژوهش‌ها و سیاست‌های اقتصادی، شماره 48، صص 85- 106.
معاونت امور اقتصادی (1386). بررسی واگذاری طرح‌های عمرانی (چالش‌ها و راهکارها)، دفتر تحقیقات و سیاست‌های مالی، وزارت امور اقتصادی و دارایی.
منصور، جهانگیر (1385). قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران، مـصوب 1358 اصلاحات و تغییرات و متمم قانون اساسی مصوب، 1368تهران: نشر دوران، .43.
هیبتی، فرشاد؛ احمدی، موسی (1388). مشارکت عمومی- خصوصی: نظام نوین تأمین مالی در واگذاری پروژه‌های زیرساختی دولت‌های مرکزی و محلی به بخش خصوصی، اولین کنفرانس بین‌المللی توسعه نظام تأمین مالی در ایران، مرکز مطالعات تکنولوژی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف.
Abdul, Quium (2011). A Guidebook on Public Private Partnership in Infrastructure, United Nations, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and Pacifc, ESCAP
Badulescu, Alina and Pacala, Anca (2012). The Privatization of state owned enterprises in the Early Transition: Necessity, Methods and Mechanisms, The USV Annals of Economics and Public Administration, Volume 12, Issue 2(16), pp. 13-21.
Bin Bayliss, Kate. and Van Waeyenberge, Elisa, (2018). “Unpacking the public-private partnership revival”, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 54, No. 4, p. 578.czak, P. (2000), Droit administratif des bien, paris: Gaullino.
Chan, A. P.; Lam, P. T.; Chan, D. W. & Cheung, E. (2008). Application of Public Private Partnership (PPP) in HongKong Special Administrative RegionThe Critics Perspectives. Pakistan. First International Conference onConstruction in developing countries.
Downes, A. S. (2006); Best Practices of Public-Private Partnerships on Education and Skills Training in the Caribbean, Available at: Davies, B., & Hentschke, G. (2006). Public/Private Partnerships in Education: insights from the field. School Leadership and Management, 26 (3), 205-226.
Fussell, H. & Beresford, C. (2009). Public-Private Partnerships: Understanding the Challenge (2nd Ed). Canada: The Center for Civic Governance.
Hammami, Mona., Ruhashyankiko, JeanFrançois., Yehoue, Etienne. B. (2006). Determinants of public-private partnerships in infrastructure. Washington, D.C: International monetary fund.
Ismail, Suhaiza & Ajija, S. A. (2011). Critical Success Factores for Public Private Partnership (PPP) Implementation in Malaysia, Bandund, Indonesia.
Jacobius, A. (2007). “Infrastructure Traffic Builds.” Pensions & Investments 35(8).
Kouser, Rehana; Azid, Toseef; Ali, Karamat (2011), Reasons for Privatization and Consequent Role of Government: Comprehensive Study Based on Early Evidence, International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, Vol: 2, No: 10. Pp:35-52.
Larocque, N. (2008); Public-Private Partnership in Basic Education: An International Review, Cfbt Education Trust. Available at Www.Cfbt. Com
Nhema, Alfred G, (2015). Privatisation of Public Enterprises in Developing Countries: An Overview, International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, Vol. 5, No. 9; 247-256.
Ngcuka, A. N. (2010). Public Private Partnership as a Means to Address theFinancing of Affordable Housing in South Africa, Graduate School of Business of the University of Stellenbosch.
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), (2009). “Privatization in the 21st century: recent experiences of OECD countries — report on good practices”. See https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/agreements/full-divestiture privatization.
Piesse, Jenifer (2001) Privatisation and the Role of Public and Private Institutions in Restructuring Programmes, 2001, available at: http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/iarc/ediais/pdf/Privatisation.pdf, accessed on 15.01.2012.
Razaki, Khalid A.; Pollastrini, Raymond; Moreland, Robert J. (2013). Privatization of infrastructure assets: financial structures, participant motivations, and lessee tax benefits, Journal of Finance & Accountancy; Feb2013, Vol. 12, p25.
Savas, E. S. (2000). Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House.
Winston, Clifford. (2014), How the Private Sector Can Improve Public Transportation Infrastructure, Mercatus Working Paper. No. 14-16, pp. 43.
Wong, M. W. (2006). Satisfying all Atakholders in Evaluating the Feasibility of Public Private Partnership Projects: A Structural Equation Model Approach” University of HongKong.
-------- (2003). European commission directorate- genera; regional policy.
Strategy
Volume 28, Issue 3 - Serial Number 92
December 2019
Pages 171-198

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 October 2020
  • Accept Date: 10 October 2020

Share

How to cite

Statistics