Analysis of Strategic Themes in the Iran General Policies: Application of Framework Analysis in Policy Research

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Assistant Professor, Management Department, University of Bojnord, Bojnord, Iran

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to extract the strategic themes and the predominant approach in the general policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran, announced by the Supreme Leader. In this policy research, 37 general policies were selected and analyzed. To analyze strategic themes, a basic codebook was developed based on the strategic management literature and research objectives. Then, the text of general policies was read several times and the strategic themes considered in the policies were counted using the thematic analysis method based on the codebook school. Using the thematic framework analysis, the general policies were analyzed in three thematic frameworks, including the strategic aspect, the core issue, and the prevailing approach. A total of 1413 policy codes were extracted, which were categorized in their strategic aspects in terms of goal, strategy, tactics, and law. The results of the analysis through using qualitative analysis software NVivo 12 show that the aspect of about 60% of policies is goals and strategies and the aspect of about 40% of them is tactics and law. About 75% of the policies are related to economic issues and 60% of the policies are focused on science and technology. Also, about 40% of the total content of policies is economic issues and about 30% of them are general, cultural, and social issues in equal proportions. The predominant approach of about 40% of policies is problem identification and solution, and the approach of about 40% of them is to seize opportunities. The approach of about 20% of general policies is crisis prevention and resolution. Finally, suggestions and guidelines for reviewing general policies are provided.

Keywords


Alavi, S. (2016). Evaluation of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Foreign Policy Based on the 20-years Perspective Document and General Politics. (1384-1388). Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 4(15), 143-163. [In Persian]
Anderson, J. (2014). Public policymaking: Cengage Learning. Houghton Mifflin College Div; 2nd edition.
Ashtarian, K. (2010). Grand Policies and Philosophical Foundation of Political Regime. Law & Political science, 40(1), 1-22. [In Persian]
Aslipour, H., Sharifzadeh, F. (2015). Environmental Policy Making Strategy in the Context of Public Decision Making Conventional Theories. Majlis and Rahbord, 22(83), 245-272. [In Persian]
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 385–405.
Biabani, E., pahlevanzadeh, F. (2020). The Pathology of Iran's Position in Global Doing Business Ranking According to General Policies. Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 7(28), 81-100. [In Persian]
Bouroojerdi, A. (2015). The share of cultural-social policies in general policies of government as well as official documents and rules of Iran. Sociological Cultural Studies, 6(3), 1-19. [In Persian]
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cassell, C., & Bishop, V. (2019). Qualitative Data Analysis: Exploring Themes, Metaphors and Stories. European Management Review, 16(1), 195–207.
Danaei Fard, H. (2010). Methodology for Formulating the National Entrepreneurship Policy of the Country: a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 2(4), 125-155. [In Persian]
Dye, T. (2013). Understanding public policy. Boston: Pearson.
Esmaeili, M., Mansourian, M. (2013). An Introduction to the Role of Iran’s Islamic Parliament in the Proper Execution of the General Policies. Public Law Knowledge Quarterly, 1(2), 1-22. [In Persian]
Esmaeili, M., Tahan Nazif, H. (2012). Relation of the General Policies of the System with the Privileged Commandments of the Islamic Ruler in the Constitution of Iran. Islamic Law Research Journal, 13(35), 73-94. [In Persian]
Fattahi Zafrqandi, A., Aslani, F. (2020). Analysis of the Ambiguity Points in Supervising the Implementation of General Policies of the System in the Legislative Process. Public Law Knowledge Quarterly, 8(26), 89-110. [In Persian]
Gale, N., Heath, G., & Cameron, E. (2013). Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multidisciplinary health research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 117-121.
Gholami, A., Bahadori Jahromi, A. (2013). Meaning, Nature and Supervision of the Implementation of General Policies of Government. Public Law Knowledge Quarterly, 2(3), 51-72. [In Persian]
Hackett, A., & Strickland, K. (2018). Using the Framework Approach to Analyse Qualitative Data: a Worked Example. Nurse Researcher, 23-48.
Haji Ali Khamseh, M. (2020). A Study on The Feasibility of Abrogated Rules and Regulations by The Means of The General Policies of Iran’s Political System. Islamic Law Research Journal, 21(51), 267-290. [In Persian]
Hassanimehr, S. (2010). Urban Development on the Economic Potential with the Overall Policy Approach (Case Study: Astara City). Territory, 7(28), 51-64. [In Persian]
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2002). The policy effects of internationalization: A subsystem adjustment analysis of policy change. . Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 4(1), 31-50.
Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2002). The policy effects of internationalization: A subsystem adjustment analysis of policy change. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 4(1), 31-50.
Ismaili, Mohsen, Balaei, Hamid, (2015).  Strategic model of national security in the general policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Scientific Journal of Security Horizons, 8(27), 5-38.
Jenkins, W. (1978). Policy analysis: a political and organisational perspective. London: Government and administration series (Oxford).
Kabi, A., Fattahi Zafarghandi, A. (2016). General Policies of the System; the Strategy of Promoting the Legislative System in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Public Law Knowledge Quarterly, 5(15), 99-122. [In Persian]
King, N., & Brooks, J. (2018). Thematic Analysis in Organisational Research. In C. Cassell, A. L. Cunliffe, & G. Grandy (Eds.), The SAGE handbook
of qualitative business and management research methods. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi: Singap.
Mobini Dehkordi, Ali; Paluj, M. (2013). Ranking of Strategies and Needs Assessment Tools in Formulating the General Policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Strategic Management Studies of National Defence Studies, 2(11), 110-140. [In Persian]
Musazadeh, E. (2008) Some Reflection on the Concept, Nature, and Legal Status of General Policies of the Regime. Islamic Law, No. 17. 151-178. [In Persian]
Nikooye, M., Fazli, S., Darvishi SeTalani, F., Keshavarz Turk, E. (2019). Providing Integrated Future-Oriented Evaluation Framework for Iran Macro Policies of Supreme Leader with Project Management Approach. Basij Strategic Studies, 22(82), 33-62. [In Persian]
Qarbi, Seyed Mohammad Javad; Jafari, A. A. (2016) Sources of Soft Power in the General Policies of the System; Case Study of the General Policies of the Sixth Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Socio-Cultural Research Journal of Rahbord, No. 19, 7-44. [In Persian]
RashidZadeh, F., Alizadeh, M. (2015). the Doctrine of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Military Security Objectives and Policies Based on Dialogue and The General Policies of the System of Velayat-E Faqih Constitution. National Security, 5(16), 167-197. [In Persian]
Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications.
Shirzad, Omid (2016). Checking the Position of General Policies in Administrative Adjudication. Journal of the Macro and Strategic Policies, 4(14), 169-183. [In Persian]
Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: the framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 52-62.
Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., O’Connor, W., Morrell, G., & Ormston, R. (2014). Analysis in practice. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice. A guide for social science students and researchers (2nd Ed.). London: SAGE.
Spencer, L., Ritchie, L., & Lewis, J. (2003). Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. London: The Cabinet Office.